Dutch terrorist revealed the truth about Europe - The Frontier Post
Vladimir Kornilov
A court in Rotterdam is scheduled to deliver a verdict on a high-profile war crimes case next Friday. On the dock is a 49-year-old resident of the town of Capelle (the very south of the Netherlands), who has lived there since 2014 with his wife and seven children, a bus driver, and a player on the local football team. The Dutch prosecutor demands that this “exemplary family man” be sentenced to 27 years in prison for the cold-blooded execution of a prisoner, committed by him in Syria in July 2012.
In court documents, he goes by the name Ahmad al-Q., but in Syria he was known as Abu Huder, a field commander of the Gurabaa Mohassan detachment, which was a structural unit of the so-called Free Syrian Army, which the West is trying to present as a “democratic opposition”, and at the same time the terrorist organization Jabhat al-Nusra.
As a noble “fighter against the Assad regime,” this Syrian, along with his large family, received refugee status in the Netherlands without any problems. And, perhaps, he would have remained in this status for a long time if the German police in 2019 did not pay attention to his suspicious meetings in their country with former militants of his battalion. Actually, the Germans pointed out this activity to their Dutch colleagues. And then a video arose in which Abu Khuder was personally involved in the execution.an officer of the Syrian government army. In the terrible footage, which the Syrian militants liked to post then on YouTube, a captive pilot with traces of torture on his body is led to the bank of the Euphrates, along the way, Abu Khudar tells why he is going to execute the officer, and then personally participates in a cold-blooded shooting. 26 shots from pistols and Kalash-nikov assault rifles are he-ard. The defendant now sa-ys that he shot past, but this does not sound convincing. In any case, the prosecutors, after analyzing the video, established that Abu Khuder at least once fired a revolver at the victim.
Now the Dutch press is trying to portray shock: this is necessary, the cold-blooded executioner lived among us and blended well with our society. And somehow everyone had already forgotten that at the moment when this militant performed executions and even bragged about them, laying them out for everyone to see, in the West he was presented as a hero. Literally a few days after the recording of the video, which is now imputed to him, the British newspaper The Guardian published a long article dedicated to this terrorist. She presented him as “one of the bravest and ruthless people in the province of Deir ez-Zaur” (a region in eastern Syria where Abu Khudar’s militants operated on). And to top off this image, she colorfully painted how he gave an interview, being wounded in the left arm by a sniper bullet, all in bandages and armbands.
Let us recall that this was a period when the West unequivocally supported the Syrian terrorists, calling them “moderate” and even “democratic.” Abu Khuder in this interview did not hide the fact that his battalion became a structural subdivision of “Al-Nusra” and “Al-Qaeda”. And US Secretary of State John Ke-rry at the debate in Congr-ess on America’s military intervention assured that there is no “al-Qaeda” in Syria. If you remember, this provoked an angry reaction from Vladimir Putin, who said : “The most basic combat link is Al-Nusra the so-called al-Qaeda unit . They know about it. And I just was not very pleased and this is surprising, we communicate with them, we proceed from the assumption that they are decent people. Well, he’s lying. And he knows that he’s lying. It’s sad. “
Until the invasion of the Islamic State terrorists in Iraq in the summer of 2014, the West tried to portray these militants as “fearless heroes”, “moderate opposition”, “freedom fighters”, vexingly dismissing many video frames such as those now appearing in the Dutch court… Many European media outlets romanticized their fellow citizens who went to fight “for the freedom of Syria.” And only when these same “warriors of light” crossed the border with Iraq, the “good guys” suddenly turned into “bad guys”, and the West began to make noise about the threat of terrorism.
But even earlier, a campaign began to welcome Syrian refugees in Europe, especially among those who were “persecuted by the Assad regime.” In this wave, the ruthless executioner Abu Huder got to the Netherlands. And many others followed him.
What problems Europe received after that can be remembered for a long time. The most telling example is the massive terrorist attacks in Paris in November 2015, which killed 130 people, not counting the terrorists. But this crime was planned by the militants in Syria, while the perpetrators were mainly citizens of European states who had combat experience of “fighting against the Assad regime.”
Especially many attempts at terrorist attacks are carried out by immigrants from Syria in Germany, which was the leader of the “open door policy” for militants. In July 2016, a 21-year-old Syrian refugee attacked passers-by with a machete in Reutlingen, Germany, killing a pregnant woman and wounding several others. The Islamists then claimed responsibility.
In October of the same year, Syrian citizen Jaber al-Bakr was arrested in Leipzig, who allegedly fled his country in connection with persecution for “criticizing the Assad regime.” The 22-year-old Syrian was accused of preparing a terrorist attack at a Berlin airport. Two days after his arrest, he was found hanged in a prison cell.
In October 2019, a Syrian refugee in Limburg, Germany, attempted to massacre passers-by using a stolen truck. Since no one was killed, he received only nine years in prison.
Such activity of yesterday’s “fighters for the freedom of Syria” and the Islamists sympathetic to them caused serious concern to the security agencies of Europe. Lawsuits like the one ending in the Netherlands are now taking place in different countries.
In 2018, a Düsseldorf court handed down a life sentence to a 43-year-old field commander operating in Aleppo under the name Abu Dib. As a militant of the “Free Syrian Army” (yes, the same “moderate opposition”), he personally kidnapped and tortured people, some to death. Then he calmly received refugee status in Germany, until one of the torture victims recognized her tormentor.
Last year, a Budapest court sentenced a former Syrian fighter (presented to the press under the name F. Hassan) to life in prison for at least two cases of public execution, in particular the beheading of a local imam.
The first war crimes case against Syrian militants in the Netherlands was the case of 24-year-old Dutch citizen Osama Ahlafa, who fought in the ranks of the Islamic State and the Free Syrian Army from 2014 to 2016. In 2019, the court sentenced him to 7.5 years in prison for photographs in which a militant happily posed in front of a crucified prisoner. The terrorist, of course, said in court that he did not participate in the execution, but the very fact of his involvement in the bullying of the body of a prisoner was recognized as a war crime.
Now in France there is a rather noisy trial over the once public face of the jihadist group Jaysh al-Islam (Army of Islam). Majdi Nema, who acted as the spokesman for this militant structure under the name of Islam Allush, was arrested in January 2020 in France. The most striking thing is that he quietly studied there at the University of Provence with a degree in international relations, having won a grant under the European Erasmus program. The families of the Syrian victims accuse him of involvement in torture, murder, kidnapping, and terrorist recruitment.
There are a lot of such processes in Europe now. While vividly discussing some of them, the Western press is amazed at how such people could get into the territory of European countries, settle there, and legalize themselves. This press simply forgot how only seven or eight years ago it created the image of these terrorists as “fearless fighters for democracy in Syria.”
When a Dutch court pronounces a (probably harsh) verdict on Abu Huder next week, it is likely to cause considerable resonance in the local media. But one can almost certainly be sure that Dutch readers will not be reminded of how the events of 2012 (when the militant carried out a public execution) were then covered by the European and Russian media. Otherwise, you will have to admit that it was Russia who called the participants in the events in Syria by their proper names: terrorists – terrorists, and their victims – victims. In contrast to the Western media, which then pretended that they “did not notice” the videos of public executions and torture committed by militants who were considered “moderate democratic opposition” in the West. Well, they themselves called these terrorists heroes, and now they wonder why these “heroes”.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario